Nearly 150 scientists recently convened
at Harvard in secret to discuss plans for the creation of a synthetic
human. The few that attended this secret meeting were instructed not
to contact the media or to tweet on the internet. The stated goal of
the meeting was to "synthesize a complete human genome in a cell
line within a period of 10 years." The prospect of chemically
constructing a human being, essentially bringing a person into the
world without biological parents, raises a number of questions, both
ethical and practical. Harvard genetics professor George Church, one
of the organizers of the meeting, has indicated that the proposed
project is not intended for the creation of people but just cells,
and he stated that it would not be restricted to the human genome.
However, Stanford's Drew Endy (bioengineering) and Northwestern's
Laurie Zoloth (medical ethics and humanities) raised questions in an
essay published shortly after the meeting—have these scientists
gone too far? “Would it be OK, for example, to sequence and then
synthesize Einstein’s genome? If so how many Einstein genomes
should be made and installed in cells, and who would get to make
them? Taking a step back, just because something becomes possible,
how should we approach determining if it is ethical to pursue?”
No comments:
Post a Comment