Yet
many companies are built around this model of constant upgrades.
Security concerns aside, it seems as if entire teams of programmers
must meet regularly to completely overhaul existing designs. Are
people complaining about things so much that all these patches are
necessary to appease the supposed disgruntled consumer? And what
about those of us that are happy with the way things are, do we not
get a vote? I understand the difficulty of programming future
software patches to address numerous iterations of different
platforms—imagine how many bugs would show up—but cosmetic
changes and interface alterations really shouldn’t affect core
programming so much that the consumer should be without the option to
choose his preferred aesthetic. Right?
No comments:
Post a Comment